Well, that's the fun part right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8b55/e8b55067d27f184d92c728110e6fddc64eca9d79" alt=""
But, yes, it is groundbreaking, sort of, and I have to give Murphy some credit. He's a "victim of the times" so to speak. Gays are going through their 1950's right now where shared beds on TV is still a display of hedonism, and where a candid portrayal of a gay person growing up "out" and confident, is an affront to people's world paradigms. So I give him credit, mainly because he's getting the ball rolling. Am I happy that such confidence in gays comes from a show flagrantly devoted to musicals, pop culture, and sex? Maybe not, but I also know that part of changing people's thoughts also requires starting on known territories.
Gays like musicals. Fine.
However, despite the kids gloves handling of the issues, these characters are reaching one of the widest audiences ever. So, that is the first approach, we'll call it The 'Glee' Approach.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6554/a655437aaf097ef992cfe8b81ea7355d33720e2d" alt=""
Essentially, the movie is one big meta piece of art.
The more vocal of the two gay men proclaims at one point, "straight people will go to movies about, war, disease, murder, and rape, but if it has gay sex....whoa! they can't go to that. Only the gays will come." And of course, I looked around the theater to see only the prophesied pockets of gay men watching the film. Was it true though? Does gay sex stop straight people from coming in the theater better than a defensive line, or was this just a case of gay people flocking inordinately to see representations of themselves on the big screen? Who knows?
The film's voracious, thought provoking instigator works at the more reserved protagonist as he struggles with his own sexuality. And indeed, in the end, the movie certainly pushed me, an out gay man, to think even further about ideas of self loathing, pride, gay activism, etc. If the Glee Approach had kids gloves on, the Weekend Approach came wielding a sharpened bayonet, at least in terms of pushing gay characters into ultra representative settings. And the actors were spectacular as well.
So then, what do you think is the correct way to continue injecting gay characters into story lines? Should we stay slow, allowing the general public time to acclimate to the warm water before turning up the heat? Or should we push them in, knowing nerves may be singed, but hey, this is life, get over it? I would love to hear your thoughts.
I think both have a place. You will reach audiences with the Glee approach, and you will also get public attention with the Weekend approach. Gay people are not cookie-cutter, after all, so why should representations be the same?
ReplyDeleteI totally agree elven-wolf. I think that both approaches serve unique functions. Unfortunately, I have had conversations advocating one way or the other so I wanted to see if anyone had any further points to make for their arguments :) Thanks for the comment!
ReplyDelete